Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
6.
South Med J ; 113(4): 147, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1006817
7.
Intern Med J ; 50(12): 1578-1583, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-991431

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to many physicians working from home whenever possible. Although the concept of 'remote' patient care has been around for decades, present circumstances have provided a grand impetus in that direction with a view to protecting both patient and caregiver. In this article, we discuss some of the various challenges to moving forward with telemedicine, drawing in part on our own experiences in dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical, technical, financial and cultural barriers to telemedicine are identified, along with a discussion concerning anticipated benefits. We conclude that the COVID-19 pandemic will likely forever change how healthcare is conducted as telemedicine figures increasingly prominently in the clinical landscape.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Médicos/tendencias , Telemedicina/métodos , Telemedicina/tendencias , Humanos , Médicos/normas , Teléfono Inteligente/normas , Teléfono Inteligente/tendencias , Telemedicina/normas , Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles/normas , Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles/tendencias
9.
J Neurointerv Surg ; 12(12): 1153-1156, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-840962

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the way medicine is practiced, including the implementation of virtual care in many specialties. In the field of interventional neuroradiology (INR), virtual clinics are an uncommon practice with minimal literature to support its use. Our objective was to report prospective, single-centre data regarding patient and physician experience with virtual INR clinics for routine follow-up appointments. METHODS: We surveyed all patients that participated in a virtual INR clinic follow-up appointment at our hospital over a 3 month period. Information gathered included length of appointment delays (ie, wait times), length of appointment times, overall satisfaction, and perceived safety metrics. A survey was also sent out to all physicians who participated in virtual clinics with similar questions. RESULTS: 118/122 patients and 6/6 physicians completed the survey. Wait times before previous in-person appointments were perceived to be much longer than virtual appointments, whereas in-person appointment times were longer. 112/118 (94.9%) patients and 4/6 (67%) physicians reported general satisfaction with their virtual clinic experience. There were 8/118 patients who felt their conditions could not be safely assessed virtually, compared with 1/6 (17%) physicians. Lastly, 72.2% of patients reported that they would prefer virtual or telephone visits in the future for non-urgent follow-up, and 5/6 (83%) of physicians reported the same. CONCLUSION: Virtual INR clinics are more efficient and are preferred among patients and physicians for non-urgent follow-up appointments. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of a virtual platform for INR care, which could be sustainable for future practice.


Asunto(s)
Citas y Horarios , Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Neurorradiografía/tendencias , Satisfacción del Paciente , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19 , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neurorradiografía/métodos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Médicos/tendencias , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
10.
Acad Med ; 95(12): 1796-1798, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-691976

RESUMEN

A compelling case exists that increasing the number of Black physicians trained and practicing in the United States is one effective intervention to promote health equity and reduce the persistent health disparities that have become glaringly evident during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the U.S. physician workforce has relatively few Black physicians. Blacks comprise approximately 13% of the U.S. population but only 5% of practicing physicians. In this Invited Commentary, the authors caution that the COVID-19 pandemic may erode the meager progress that has been made in increasing the number of Black physicians. This loss of Black physicians may happen because Black patients are overrepresented among cases of COVID-19, Black physicians care for relatively more Black patients often in settings with less access to SARS-CoV-2 testing and personal protective equipment, and Black physicians have more comorbid chronic conditions that increase their own susceptibility to mortality from COVID-19. All organizations in which physicians train and practice must redouble their efforts to recruit, train, and retain Black physicians. If nothing else, the COVID-19 pandemic must make academic health centers and health care systems recognize Black physicians as the precious resource they are and protect and reward them accordingly.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/etnología , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/tendencias , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Médicos/tendencias , Atención a la Salud/etnología , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA